The hiring of a law firm is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience. Personal Injury Lawyers serving Daytona, Melbourne, Orlando, Florida and Nationwide.This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.
The goal of the health care and insurance industries in seeking a constitutional amendment to limit attorneys’ fees in medical negligence cases was to discourage trial attorneys from accepting medical malpractice cases. Florida trial attorney groups and consumer groups responded by seeking an amendment giving patients certain rights. One result was Section 25, Article X, giving patients the right to previously privileged and confidential “peer review” and “work product” incident reports concerning “adverse incidents” occuring during the provision of medical services.
The health care industry has fought ferociously for four years to have appeals courts interpret the amendment in a way that would maintain secrecy of these incident reports. The Supreme Court of Florida not only upheld the patients’ right to know under Section 25, Article X, but made it clear that it applies retroactively to incident reports prepared prior to its effective date. The Supreme Court opinion also held that the amendment overrides old recognized privileges, such as the so-called “peer review” privilege, that have historically given health care providers the legal right to maintain the secrecy of these “adverse incident reports”, often depriving medical malpractice victims of the right to know why they were hurt by the profession whose job was to heal them.
Hopefully, answers will now come easier to medical malpractice victims and their counsel, and the details of tragic events will no longer remain well kept secrets of the medical profession. If you or a loved one has been a victim of medical malpractice, call CGWC for a free consultation.